Menakar Pro-Kontra Dampak Pendekatan Konsekuensi Perilaku terhadap Motivasi Instrinsik pada Gen-Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54471/qfqdv196Keywords:
teori behavioristik, pendekatan konsekuensi perilaku, motivasi instrinsik, gen-zAbstract
Teori behavioris adalah pendekatan sistematis untuk mengelola perilaku yang berfokus pada konsekuensiperilaku itu sendiri. . Hal ini dikembangkan melalui oleh Pavlov, Watson, Thorndike, dan Skinner. Ada tiga konsekuensi utama teori behavioristic yaitu Reinforcemet, Punishmnet, dan Extinction. Reinfocement adalah tindakan mengarahkan stimulus pada hasil yang diinginkan, sedangkan punishment adalah tindakan menghilangkan stimulus yang tidak bermanfaat. Sedangkan extinction adalah tindakan yang menyebabkan hilangnya stimulus dari suatu situasi. Dalam praktiknya, teori behavioristic ini banyak di implementasikan dalam pendidikan utamanya dalam modifikasi perilaku siswa. Seperti dalam manajemen kelas. Mudahnya implementasi dan hasil yang instan dari penerapan teori ini menjadikan pendekatan behavioristic sangat popular dilaksanakan. Namun terdapat banyak pro-kontra terkait pelaksanaannya dalam setting sekolah utamanya pada generasi Z (gen-Z) yang lebih terbuka mengekspresikan perasaannya, menuntut demokrasi pendidikan yang lebih tinggi serta memiliki banyak akses informasi terkait peneyelenggaraan pendidikan. Dalam hal inilah penelitian ini diposisikan. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dengan melakukan telaah terhadap artikel-artikel dan buku-buku terkait tentang teori behavioristic, pro dan kontra pelaksanaannya serta beberapa salah kaprah yang jamak ditemukan di lapangan.
References
Afriana, S., Ramadhana, N. H., & Pratiwi, Y. (2022). Analisis Teori operant conditioning TERHADAP KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK SELAMA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. 9(September), 645–659.
Akin-Little, K. A., & Little, S. G. (2004). Re-Examining the Overjustification Effect. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000037628.81867.69
Akin-Little, K., & Eckert, T. (2004). Extrinsic Reinforcement in the Classroom: Bribery or Best Practice. School Psychology …, 33(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.774
Barbetta, P. M., Norona, K. L., & Bicard, D. F. (2005). Classroom Behavior Management: A Dozen Common Mistakes and What to Do Instead. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 49(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.49.3.11-19
Cameron, J. (2001). Negative Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation--A Limited Phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001029
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363–423. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064003363
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The undermining effect is a reality after all—Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Gingras (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.692
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again. Review of Educational Researchl Spring, 71(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001
Dhiya, M., Sayekti, S. P., Bana, N., & Nurmaulida, N. (2023). Analisis Deskriptif Pengelolaan Kelas melalui Pendekatan Perubahan Perilaku. 2(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.56672/attadris.v2i2.74
Filcheck, H. A., Mcneil, C. B., Greco, L. A., & Bernard, R. S. (2004). Using a whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10168
Fuad, M., Suyanto, E., & Muhammad, U. A. (2021). Can ‘ Reward and Punishment ’ Improve Student Motivation ? 10(1), 165–171.
Gaol, A. F. L., Nelyahardi, N., & Yaksa, R. A. (2023). Faktor Motivasi dalam Mendorong Keberhasilan Belajar Siswa di SMA Negeri 4 Kota Jambi. Journal on Education, 5(2), 2801–2807. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.927
Hadi, S., Setiyana, H., & Sutiyono, A. (2006). Learning Behavior Theory According to Ivan Pavlov, thorndike, Skinner and Albert Bandura. 1(1), 1–36.
Jones, V. ., & Jones, L. . (1998). Comprehensive Classroom Management : Creating Community of Support and Solving Problem (5th Editio). Allyn and Bacon.
Miller, W. M. R. G. E. (2003). HANDBOOK of PSYCHOLOGY VOLUME 7 [EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY] (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1037/005272
Morris, J., Marzano, M., Dandy, N., & O’Brien, L. (2012). Theories and Models of behaviour and Behavior change.
Pangesti, W. A., Fanani, A., & Prastyo, D. (2020). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(30s), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol16.no30s.a2753
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Raguz, N. (2023). Impact of Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation and Persistence in Generation Z.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(xxxx), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Salkind, N. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology (N. J. Salkind & K. Rassmussen (eds.)). SAGE Publications.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories : An Educational Perspective. In Printice Hall Inc., New Jersey (6th Editio, Vol. 53, Issue 9). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice.
Starecek, A., & Caganova, D. (2023). Personality traits and motivation of Generation Z students in management study programs in higher education. 6(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i1.1102.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qurroti A’yun (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
